View previous stories
	Nigerian prisons a "national scandal": Amnesty by Tume Ahemba Reuters   Lagos, Feb 25, 2008   Nigeria''s prisons are a "national scandal", filled with thousands of inmates who have never been convicted of any crime and some prisoners wait decades to face trial, Amnesty International said on Tuesday.   The human rights group said only about 35 percent of Nigerian inmates have been convicted in court.   "The Nigerian government is simply not complying with its national and international obligations when it comes to the criminal justice system in Nigeria and must begin to do so seriously and urgently," said Amnesty''s Aster van Kregten.   "The conditions we saw and the stories we heard from inmates are a national scandal," she said.   Nigeria returned to democracy in 1999 after decades of military rule and the government has repeatedly promised to reform the justice system to reduce over-crowding in prisons and speed up the pace of trials, but there has been little change.   "The reality is that those in prison stand little chance of their rights being respected."   The report said poor conditions, including severe over-crowding, were seriously damaging the mental and physical health of thousands of inmates.   Many of those awaiting trial are effectively presumed guilty, even when there is little evidence of their involvement in the crime of which they are accused.   The group also found that people not suspected of committing any crime, but rather arrested in place of a family member the police could not locate, are locked up with convicted criminals.   Amnesty also cited the case of 35-year-old mentally ill woman, who was brought to prison by her brother because the family could no longer cope with her condition.   The woman spent about three years in jail, sleeping on the floor with 11 other women in a cell, until she was rescued by a local women''s rights group.   Amnesty says there are about 700 prisoners on death row in Nigeria, some of them convicted by sharia courts in the predominantly Muslim north. It says 200 of them have been awaiting death for over 10 years and some for more than 25 years.
	The role of special procedures of the Human Rights Council by UN Department of Public Information   Feb 2008   Year in and year out, special rapporteurs and other independent human rights experts monitor, examine, advise and publicly report on certain types of human rights violations or violations in a specific country. Acting in their personal capacity, much of their work is conducted behind the scenes, and does not always receive wide attention. Some would say they are the unsung heroes of the UN human rights monitoring system.   The nuts and bolts of human rights monitoring is not necessarily what grabs headlines – but it was a core function that evolved under the United Nations Commission on Human Rights (CHR), replaced in 2006 by the Human Rights Council (HRC). Some would say the unsung heroes of human rights are those who are responsible for carrying out what is known as the “special procedures” system. Special procedures are special rapporteurs, representatives, independent experts and working groups that monitor, examine, advise and publicly report on a thematic issue (thematic mandates) or on a human rights situation in a specific country (country mandates).   Special rapporteurs often conduct fact-finding missions to countries to investigate allegations of human rights violations. They also receive, assess and verify complaints from alleged victims of human rights violations – and follow up with the Government concerned.   Their reports are made public, as are their recommendations. They cover a broad range of human rights themes such as trafficking, child prostitution and pornography, indigenous people, internally displaced persons, migrants – they also promote freedom of religion or belief, freedom of opinion and expression, adequate food and housing as well as the independence of judges and lawyers.   On occasion, their work makes the headlines – such as with Myanmar or Sudan, or on arbitrary executions or torture – with Governments complaining they are being intrusive. The work of special procedures is critical in identifying, assessing, and addressing gaps in the implementation of human rights at the country level, and ensuring increased compliance with human rights standards. Special procedures’ dialogue with Governments and with other relevant stakeholders is a concrete means to engage with countries on human rights, and has real impact on the ground.   Now a review of these mechanisms, the special procedures, is under way at the HRC. All stakeholders, including Governments and civil society actors at the national and international level, agree that the special procedures system is a valuable legacy of the CHR, and recognize its positive contribution to making a difference on the ground so that human rights and fundamental freedoms can be tracked and promoted.   In 2007, there were 40 special procedures, 28 thematic mandates and 12 country mandates. During the same year, special procedures mandate holders undertook 62 visits to 51 countries. They submitted 135 reports to the HRC and 20 to the General Assembly (GA). They issued over 150 press statements and sent almost 1,000 communications to 125 countries.   Maldives: Following the visit to the Maldives by the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers in February 2007, the Government implemented one of the Special Rapporteur’s recommendations, which addressed gender discrimination in the judiciary, by appointing the first female judges in that country in July 2007.   Cote d’Ivoire: The Representative of the Secretary-General on the human rights of internally displaced persons (IDPs) visited Côte d’Ivoire in April 2006, while the country was still experiencing conflict. His report recommended that the authorities develop a strategy for the protection of IDPs. This issue was addressed by the Ouagadougou Peace Agreement in March 2007.   Haiti: The Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Haiti has welcomed good cooperation with the Government, noting progress in the implementation of his recommendations, particularly on judicial and police reform and on the promotion of women''s rights.   Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK): Following a January 2008 visit to neighbouring Republic of Korea, the UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights in North Korea reported that the country continues to violate human rights systematically by torturing, publicly prosecuting and oppressing its citizens. DPRK has refused to allow him to enter the country.   In September 2007, the General Assembly adopted the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. The Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights and fundamental freedoms of indigenous people was a key advocate in the discussions that led to this ground-breaking instrument. Visit the related web page
	View more stories