View previous stories
	Rising intolerance must be addressed to end hostility towards religious minorities by Minority Rights Group, Scroll India, agencies India   Constant communal violence over the past five years has had a heavy toll on minorities in certain areas of India. Muslims make up the large majority of victims of hate crimes, threats, attacks on places of worship, and forced conversion, but Christians, Sikhs and Dalits have also been affected, says a new report.   According to the report, A Narrowing Space: Violence and Discrimination Against India’s Religious Minorities, by the Centre for Study of Society and Secularism (CSSS) and Minority Rights Group International (MRG), unless efforts are advanced to address impunity and rising intolerance the situation will further deteriorate.   The report is accompanied by an online interactive map Mapping Communal Violence in India 2013-2016, which depicts levels of communal violence across India based on official statistics.   ‘While communal violence has long been a concern for India’s religious minorities, the current situation is particularly severe,’ says Claire Thomas, MRG’s Deputy Director.   In recent years there has been rising hostility towards India’s religious minorities, particularly since the right-wing Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government, led by Narendra Modi, took power in May 2014 and began to actively promote Hindu nationalism. The report says that Modi’s reluctance to condemn these attacks is also reflected in more stringent laws that discriminate against religious minorities.   ‘The passage of legislation which contributes to the targeting of minorities, such as more stringent anti-cow slaughter laws, combined with long-standing social, economic, and cultural discrimination, has left India’s religious minorities feeling increasingly insecure, and is particularly the case for those suffering multiple discrimination, such as women and low-caste communities,’ adds Thomas.   In this environment, extremist right-wing groups have been emboldened to escalate attacks against religious minorities, including vigilante ‘cow protection’ groups and those involved with ‘anti-love jihad’ campaigns, both of which have become increasingly prominent since 2015. Perpetrators have been further aided by the problem of official indifference and even complicity in these attacks, say MRG and CSSS.   Unless the generalised climate of impunity is urgently addressed, attacks against religious minorities are likely to continue. MRG and CSSS urge the Indian government to enforce existing legislation protecting the rights of all religious communities, with the full commitment of police, judiciary and other actors.   The BJP’s promotion of Hindu nationalism is not only exclusionary towards India’s minorities, but has contributed to an overall atmosphere of intolerance in India, say the rights organisations.   ‘High-level government officials have made statements that are spiteful to minorities, which has in turn motivated Hindu nationalists to indulge in violence on the streets,’ says Irfan Engineer, Director of CSSS. ‘For instance, the Minister of Women and Child Welfare stated that profits from slaughter houses are being used to fund terrorism. Not only was this an out of turn remark; it also encouraged vigilantes to attack members of minority communities engaged in the cattle trade,’ he added.   The report, and the interactive map launched alongside it, says that communal violence remains primarily concentrated in certain states, with the highest levels in Uttar Pradesh. Since recent elections in the state in early 2017 won by the BJP, there has been a spate of anti-Muslim violence, including reports of Muslims families fleeing their homes to other areas of Uttar Pradesh on account of rising threats and violence.   It also warns that levels of communal and anti-minority violence are likely to be considerably higher than reflected in official figures, as many incidents go unreported by both the Indian authorities and the media.   http://minorityrights.org/2017/06/29/communal-violence-impunity-rising-intolerance-must-addressed-end-hostility-towards-religious-minorities-new-report-online-map/   http://scroll.in/article/835315/a-country-for-the-cow-the-chronicle-of-a-visit-to-pehlu-khans-village http://scroll.in/article/847268/as-india-turns-70-a-somber-reminder-of-stolen-freedoms http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/latenightlive/india-says-not-in-my-name/8674456 http://www.dw.com/en/indias-dalits-outraged-at-increase-in-caste-motivated-attacks/a-40816738 Visit the related web page
	UN Security Council Open Debate: Conflict Prevention and Sustaining Peace by Simon Adams Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect   In January Sweden, the current President of the UN Security Council, convened a meeting on “Maintenance of International Peace and Security: Conflict Prevention and Sustaining Peace.” The meeting provided the first opportunity for the new UN Secretary-General, António Guterres, to formally address the Council.   The Secretary-General discussed reforms he is implementing within the UN system to strengthen the organization’s capacity to address the root causes of conflict. During the more than 8-hour debate, which featured statements from a number of ministerial level participants, many countries highlighted the need to improve conflict response alongside conflict prevention, noting the urgent need to address ongoing violence and atrocities in Syria, Yemen, South Sudan and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.   Simon Adams, the Director of the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect offers a 10 page briefing note for the incoming UN Secretary-General.   It is easy to criticize the UN for its failures and inscrutable deficiencies. Politically, it is a twentieth century organization that is struggling to deal with twenty-first century challenges. But despite all its inefficiencies and frailties, the UN still has immense diplomatic convening power and is uniquely capable of transcending national and regional interests to speak on behalf of the international community.   For ordinary people trapped in the most remote, deadly and dangerous conflicts in the world today the presence of the UN can mean the difference between life and death.   Unlike the League of Nations, the UN need not crumble. But if it is to survive the twenty-first century the UN must work with governments and civil society to advance, rather than retreat from, its core global values and mission. This is why the next Secretary-General must focus, above all else, on upholding humanitarian and human rights norms and preventing mass atrocities.   The next Secretary-General must be a pragmatic idealist who must do everything within their power to mobilize the international community to consistently uphold its responsibility to protect where ever and when ever people face the threat of the machete or the mass grave.   http://www.globalr2p.org/media/files/notes-for-the-next-sg.pdf Visit the related web page
	View more stories