Red Cross says Global Ban on Cluster Bombs Urgent by Reuters 12:24pm 8th Feb, 2008   February 7, 2008 (Reuters)    GENEVA - The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) called on Wednesday for urgent conclusion of a global pact to ban cluster weapons even if big powers like the United States, Russia and China were not ready to join.    The Swiss-based humanitarian body’s senior arms specialist, Peter Herby, told a news conference the ICRC hoped the text of a treaty would be approved at a conference in Dublin in May and be signed by many countries by the end of the year.    “We need a strong, legally-binding treaty urgently, in 2008, that would ban the use, development, stockpiling and transfer of inaccurate and unreliable cluster munitions,” said Herby, who heads the ICRC’s Arms Unit.    Herby discounted arguments from some producer states that the weapons — which can spread hundreds of bomblets over a target area — can be made to self-destruct or otherwise rendered harmless after conflicts in which they have been used.    Cluster bombs — which campaigners say have killed or maimed thousands of civilians stumbling on them — can never be made totally reliable, he declared.    “We are not proposing any exclusions (from a treaty), as some states have,” said Herby.    Some 140 states are involved in the so-called Oslo process, launched by Norway three years ago to prepare a treaty on an international ban outside the United Nations-sponsored CCW talks on dangerous weapons which many think can only move slowly.    A similar process has led to an international ban on landmines which major powers have still not signed up to.    Herby said urgency was added to the issue by the growing age of stockpiles, and by the risk that many more countries — and also “non-state actors” — jargon for terrorist or guerrilla groups — would get them.    An international group called Cluster Munitions Coalition (CMC) says nearly 100 countries favour a ban, although some like Germany, France, Italy and Japan want a transitional period first.    The United States, Russia and China are reluctant to give up the weapons — originally developed to counter tank and troop offensives across borders during the Cold War but since used in many types of conflicts.
	Next (more recent) news item
	Next (older) news item