Natural Disasters suffer from deadly Neglect says Red Cross by IRIN, Reuters 9:26am 15th Dec, 2006   Johannesburg. December 14, 2006    Curing the Symptoms Not the Cause. (UN Integrated Regional Information Networks).    Emergency interventions to alleviate suffering during times of crisis, such as the 2005 food shortages in Malawi, often cure the symptoms but not the cause, said the annual World Disasters Report, launched on Thursday by the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies.    Human tragedy usually unfolded as a result of neglected developmental crises, as in Malawi, Niger and the Horn of Africa, where "slow-motion" food shortages became "full-blown humanitarian crises before our eyes", the International Federation commented. The persistent and recurrent nature of many humanitarian disasters was driven as much by chronic poverty and vulnerability as by natural hazards.    The report called for the establishment of larger, common, unearmarked emergency funds for neglected crisis situations and sectors, and called on countries and donors to commit at least 10 percent of emergency funds to disaster risk reduction.    Lack of funds to provide timely agricultural inputs in Malawi, combined with pockets of chronic food insecurity, drove the numbers in need of aid to almost five million in 2005.    In Niger, the 2005 crisis, which threatened 2.5 million people with starvation, has been widely recognised as the result of chronic food insecurity that left 40 percent of children routinely malnourished before the situation reached a peak and was brought to the attention of the global media and humanitarian agencies.    "The bigger question," said Peter Rees, head of the International Federation"s Operations Support Department, "is that humanitarian funding often comes as a result of a failed development approach or a failed political process." He pointed to a lack of dialogue between the humanitarian and development sectors in assessing spending priorities.    In the case of Malawi, humanitarian aid offered in 2005 should have been sufficiently comprehensive to address rural and urban hunger by benefiting all smallholder households without building debt. The International Federation found that for every dollar of aid Malawi received for its food crisis - whether within or outside of the United Nations appeal - it paid a dollar back in debt repayments. "It is difficult to understand how its external debt could not have been reviewed at a time when the country was facing a humanitarian emergency affecting five million people," said the report.    The International Federation called for at least 10 years to 15 years of guaranteed funding to help Malawi"s agriculture sector incorporate "best-bet" technologies, such as high-quality seeds designed for local conditions and early maturing varieties to reduce vulnerability to drought, as well as other measures.    Amos Zaindi, of GOAL, the Irish development NGO, said Malawi had learnt from the crisis. "The government and donors ensured that agricultural inputs were distributed as early as October this year [2006], unlike the year before, which created the food shortages in 2005."    A successful government-sponsored fertiliser and seed distribution programme towards the end of 2005 also ensured that Malawi enjoyed its biggest ever harvest of 2.6 million mt of maize in 2006, at least half-a-million tonnes more than its annual requirement of two million mt, but lack of funding affected its seed distribution programme in 2006.    Globally, aid coverage was found to be inequitable. Millions of people were left out of vital, potentially life-saving aid because funds were directed at high-profile disasters, while crises like the one in Malawi were neglected, the report pointed out. Governments donated over US$12 billion in bilateral humanitarian aid in 2005 - the highest figure since record keeping began in 1970. In addition, individuals gave over $5.5 billion to assist survivors of the Indian Ocean tsunami - the most money nongovernmental organisations (NGOs) worldwide had ever collected in a year. Total aid for the tsunami from private individuals and governments amounted to more than $14 billion.    The tsunami was the best-funded disaster, with at least $1,241 per beneficiary in humanitarian aid - 50 times more than for those caught up in the worst-funded crises. Emergency appeals for Chad, Guyana, Côte d"Ivoire, Malawi and Niger raised, on average, less than $27 per person in need.    The International Federation said forms of financing other than Western governments and publics should not be neglected. It found that non-Western donor governments were playing a larger part in humanitarian aid, especially since the tsunami.    According to the World Bank, global remittances to the developing world totalled around $126 billion in 2004 - 50 percent more than all humanitarian and development aid given by the West. In Guatemala, remittances received during 2005 in the municipalities affected by Hurricane Stan totalled $413 million - 20 times more than the United Nations appeal had raised by early December that year.    Uneven media coverage also affected funding for crisis situations. The report noted that Hurricane Katrina, which killed about 1,300 people, generated 40 times more media coverage than Hurricane Stan, which killed 1,600 people in Guatemala shortly afterwards. The International Federation urged the donor community to develop a closer dialogue with the media on neglected crises, and better connections with the root causes of crises in the developing world.    14 Dec 2006 (Reuters)    Natural disasters that kill thousands of people in poor countries and wreck the lives of many more are made worse by long-term "deadly neglect" by richer nations, the global Red Cross body IFRC said on Thursday.    The grouping, the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, also said in its annual World Disasters Report that Western self-interest drives much media coverage of disasters and humanitarian crises.    "The past two years have seen unprecedented attention lavished on disasters by the media, by the public and by aid organisations across the world," said IFRC Secretary General Markku Niskala in an introduction to the report.    "Yet for every crisis that takes centre stage, there are a dozen more waiting in the wings for a walk-on part."    The report identified some of these as malnutrition and starvation due to drought in Malawi, social decay and crime in Guatemala, childbirth mortality in Nepal, and the death at sea of hundreds of would-be migrants from Africa to Europe.    Last year"s record hurricane season in the Caribbean region, the South Asia earthquake that hit Pakistan and India, and the Indian Ocean tsunami of December 26, 2004 "combined to catapult so-called "natural" disasters into the limelight," said Niskala.    The response had been a record of over $17 billion in international emergency assistance, according to the report.    "Yet millions missed out on vital, potentially life-saving aid because funds were directed at high-profile disasters, while countless other crises were neglected," the IFRC said.    The response from governments and from individual donors through relief bodies to the tsunami, which left some over 200,000 dead, including some Western tourists, accounted for around $14 billion of the $17 billion total.    This amounted to $1,241 for every beneficiary -- against an average of $27 per person in response to Red Cross and other appeals for victims of humanitarian disasters and conflicts in Chad, Guyana, Ivory Coast, Malawi and Niger.    In terms of global media coverage, the Geneva-based IFRC said, Hurricane Katrina which devastated the U.S. city of New Orleans in September 2005 and killed some 1,300 generated 40 times more than Hurricane Stan which left 1,600 dead in Guatemala a few days later.    Such disparities, said Federation President Juan Manuel Suarez del Toro, are unacceptable.    "The generous response in 2005 show people and governments are committed to helping those in need. Now we must ensure aid goes where it is most needed and that it is not skewed for political, security or media reasons," he added.    "Common sense would dictate that the larger the disaster, the greater the media attention and the more generous the response" said Niskala in his introduction to the report.    "That was certainly the case with the tsunami. But it is unfortunately not a universal rule. Research across a range of disasters reveals that there is no clear link between death tolls and media interest. Rather, Western self-interest gives journalists a stronger steer."
	Next (more recent) news item
	Next (older) news item